Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades : a test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn
(Book)

Book Cover
Published
[Washington, D.C.] : Ecological Society of America, 2008.
Physical Description
pages 818-828 : illustrations, maps, charts ; 28 cm.
Status

Summary

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

Copies

LocationCall NumberStatus
Yellowstone Research Library - Pamphlet or Vertical File CollectionECOL-TROPHIC(BERGER)On Shelf

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Format
Book
Language
English
Notes
General Note
Printout of article.
Summary
"The traditional trophic cascades model is based on consumer-resource interactions at each link in a food chain. However, trophic-level interactions, such as mesocarnivore release resulting from intraguild predation, may also be important mediators of cascades. From September 2001 to August 2004, we used spatial and seasonal heterogeneity in wolf distribution and abundance in the southern Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem to evaluate whether mesopredator release of coyotes (Canis latrans), resulting from the extirpation of wolves (Canis lupus), accounts for high rates of coyote predation on pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) fawns observed in some areas. Results of this ecological perturbation in wolf densities, coyote densities, and pronghorn neonatal survival at wolf-free and wolf-abundant sites support the existence of a species-level trophic cascade. That wolves precipitated a trophic cascade was evidence by fawn survival rates that were four-fold higher at sites used by wolves. A negative correlation between coyote and wolf densities supports the hypothesis that interspecific interactions between the two species facilitated the difference in fawn survivial. Whereas densities of resident coyotes were similar between wolf-free and wolf-abundant sites, the abundance of transient coyotes was significantly lower in areas used by wolves. Thus, differential effects of wolves on solitary coyotes may be an important mechanism by which wolf limit coyote densities. Our results support the hypothesis that mesopredator release of coyotes contributes to high rates of coyote predation on pronghorn fawns, and demonstrate the importance of alternative food web pathways in structuring the dynamics of terrestrial systems."--Abstract

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (Style Guide)

Berger, K. M., Gese, E. M., & Berger, J. (2008). Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: a test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn. Ecological Society of America.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 18th Edition (Style Guide)

Berger, Kim Murray, Eric M. Gese and Joel. Berger. 2008. Indirect Effects and Traditional Trophic Cascades: A Test Involving Wolves, Coyotes, and Pronghorn. Ecological Society of America.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 18th Edition (Style Guide)

Berger, Kim Murray, Eric M. Gese and Joel. Berger. Indirect Effects and Traditional Trophic Cascades: A Test Involving Wolves, Coyotes, and Pronghorn. Ecological Society of America, 2008.

UCL Harvard Citation (Style Guide)

Berger, K. M., Gese, E. M. and Berger, J. (2008). Indirect effects and traditional trophic cascades: a test involving wolves, coyotes, and pronghorn. [Washington, D.C.]: Ecological Society of America.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (Style Guide)

Berger, Kim Murray., Eric M Gese, and Joel Berger. Indirect Effects and Traditional Trophic Cascades: A Test Involving Wolves, Coyotes, and Pronghorn. Ecological Society of America, 2008.

Note: Citations contain only title, author, edition, and publisher. Only UCL Harvard citations contain the year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of May 2025.